SGCR - Intellectual Property Experts Simões Garcia Corte-Real & Associados
  • About Us
    • Office
    • Our team
    • Memberships
    • Contacts
  • Services
    • Patents | Utility Models
    • Trademarks
    • Designs
    • Domain Names
    • IP Searches
    • IP Litigation
    • Licensing
    • IP due diligences
  • Resources
    • News
    • Brochure
    • ECTA Round Table: IP TRANSLATOR
    • Site Map
    • ECTA Round Table 2015: Hague System
  • IP Basics
    • Portugal
    • Macao
    • Angola
    • Mozambique
    • Sao Tome and Prince
    • Cabo Verde
    • European Union
  • Home

PORTUGAL | EUROPEAN UNION
MACAO | ANGOLA | MOZAMBIQUE
SAO TOME AND PRINCE | CABO VERDE

  • English
  • Português
SGCR - Intellectual Property Experts Simões Garcia Corte-Real & Associados

Wednesday, 19 February 2014 21:16

Unified Patent Court and Patents with Unitary Effect criticized by industry and experts in meeting of ACPI (Portugal)

Written by Cristina Brites
  • font size decrease font size increase font size
  • Print
  • Email
Rate this item
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
(0 votes)
Unified Patent Court and Patents with Unitary Effect criticized by industry and experts in meeting of ACPI (Portugal) Unified Patent Court and Patents with Unitary Effect criticized by industry and experts in meeting of ACPI (Portugal)

On 12 February 2014 the VI annual Forum of ACPI, the Portuguese Association of Intellectual Property Consultants, took place in Lisbon. The sessions covered the European patent and trademark legislative packages, in particular the European regulations on patents with unitary effect and the proposal to ratify the international agreement establishing the Unified Patent Court (UPC) with exclusive and supranational jurisdiction across the EU.

 

Besides IP Consultants and experts from Portugal, Spain and Poland the meeting was attended by representatives of industry associations from Portugal (CIP) and Spain (CEOE). In the lively session for patents several serious flaws were pointed out to the European package:

1 – From the perspective of Portuguese industry, the unitary effect of a European patent does not provide any significant advantage since very few European patents are granted to residents in Portugal (0.05 % out of total grantings by the EPO in 2012) and that, on average, those patents are not validated in more than 4-5 EU countries.

2 – The unitary patent does not cover Spain, first destination of Portuguese exportations in the EU, therefore Portugal should never ratify the package before Spain. Also, the unitary effect will not cover Italy and Poland, countries that also oppose the project as it stands.

3 – The language regime would discriminate the Portuguese language in that Portuguese companies wishing to obtain a patent for unitary effect , would always have to provide EPO with a translation with legal value in English, French or German, whereas companies that use these 3 languages ​​would not be required to submit any translation with legal value.

4 – The new regime would force Portugal to give legal protection to unitary patents written in English, French or German, transferring the costs of translation from the owners of such patents to all companies or institutions in Portugal wishing to assess the risks of infringement of such patents.

5 – The UPC would create a private justice for holders of European patents, which are 96% of the patents annually protected in Portugal, emptying the recently created Intellectual Property Court of Lisbon of one of its core competences and hampering its specialization in patent law.

6 – If Portugal ratifies the UPC treaty, resident companies in Portugal shall be subject to be sued in a court outside the country (probably in Paris, London or Munich), composed of foreign judges, and the language of proceedings will not be Portuguese.

7 – The rules of UPC are unbalanced in favor of patent holders and the expected litigation costs will be huge and absolutely unaffordable for companies resident in Portugal, undermining the right to a fair and equitable process.

Read 1344 times Last modified on Tuesday, 14 April 2015 21:16
Tweet
Published in News
Tagged under
  • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
Cristina Brites

Cristina Brites

Latest from Cristina Brites

  • New Domain Names .PT with two characters only
  • The importance of being Magenta – judgment of Lisbon IP Court
  • Macao court confirms PAIR PLUS not a trademark
  • Cape Verde – New IP Office name: IGQPI
  • Mopping up the sauce: La Comadre

Related items

  • Arbitration in patent pharma disputes becomes voluntary
  • Court of Appeal confirms the IP Court on Supplementary Protection Certificates: the product is not protected by the basic patent
  • UK announces surprising decision to ratify the UPC Agreement
  • BREXIT - British referendum and intellectual property
  • INFARMED issues Therapeutic Recommendation on Statins
More in this category: « How trademarks looked like 100 years ago (II) Patent first filing rule interpreted by Lisbon Court of Commerce »
back to top
  • English
  • Português

© SGCR

  • About Us
    • Office
    • Our team
    • Memberships
    • Contacts
  • Services
    • Patents | Utility Models
    • Trademarks
    • Designs
    • Domain Names
    • IP Searches
    • IP Litigation
    • Licensing
    • IP due diligences
  • Resources
    • News
    • Brochure
    • ECTA Round Table: IP TRANSLATOR
    • Site Map
    • ECTA Round Table 2015: Hague System
  • IP Basics
    • Portugal
      • National Law for IP matters
      • International Law
      • Portuguese Patents
      • European Patents – National Validation
      • Utility Patents
      • Designs
      • Trade and Service Marks
    • Macao
      • National Law for IP matters
      • International Law
      • Patents
      • Utility Patents
      • Designs
      • Trade and Service Marks
    • Angola
      • National Law for IP matters
      • International Law
      • Patents
      • Designs
      • Trade and Service Marks
    • Mozambique
      • National Law for IP matters
      • International Law
      • Patents
      • Designs
      • Trade and Service Marks
    • Sao Tome and Prince
      • National Law for IP matters
      • International Law
      • Patents
      • Designs
      • Trade and Service Marks
    • Cabo Verde
      • National Law for IP matters
      • International Law
      • Patents
      • Designs
      • Trade and Service Marks
    • European Union
      • European Union Trademarks
      • Community Designs
  • Home